Branding gets right to the core of your business’ values. It is about discovering and communicating the essence of your business and its offerings to your customers. Your brand creates your business’ reputation and its ‘personality’ and can help you stand out from the crowd.
There are basics to getting this right. Amidst the furore of this week’s attempts by Cardiff City’s Malaysian owners to re-brand the club’s shirt and crest, we look at whether or not they got it right.
Here, our director Dan Tyte, takes us through five key things to consider:
1- Brand equity – There is extensive good will in the existing brand amongst fans, potential fans and the football community across the UK. Any new brand entering a crowded marketplace will tell you that it’s an uphill struggle. Try launching a new cola and taking on Coke and Pepsi.
2- Significant brand heritage -Brands give their right arm for ‘provenance’, essentially a compelling story on the origins of the brand. Look at Guinness’ tale of the Arthur burning the hops or the Marks and Spencer’s penny bazaar. It’s difficult to sell one thought up purely for exploitative commercial reasons as authentic.
3- Wrong brand strategy – Other clubs like Arsenal have changed their badges recently. But changes need to go down the evolution, not revolution, route. When the City badge changed in the Hammam era, the Bluebird was retained and anchored the new design in the history of the club, something that apparently was negotiated by fan representatives in this instance but wasn’t communicated back to the masses effectively.
4- Limited power for advocates for change – The Chinese proverb “Tell me and I ‘ll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I’ll understand” springs to mind here. Tan’s plan has been imposed top-down, not bottom-up with the room for insight and input by fans. Okay, the information was leaked online, but the plans were for it go through without consultation. When fans were invited in, the red kit was presented as a fait accompli.
5- Brand icon- Brands need icons- think of McDonalds and golden arches or Disney and the fairytale castle. The blue shirt was seen at Wembley, complete with bluebird and Malaysia sponsor, by a TV audience of millions worldwide this year. Why take out all of that free advertising for your brand icon and six months down the line change the offer?
Andy Green, our associate director and fan of Cardiff’s play-off conquerors West Ham, continues:
6- Lacks significant trigger for change – Brand revolutions work when there is a significant negative event. Although missing out on the play-offs hurts, this isn’t a sufficiently traumatic episode to warrant revolutionary change.
7- Brand evangelists not on side – Brands needs their most passionate fans behind them in order to flourish. For this to be the case, the board needed to get fans in before decisions were made to give a semblance of ownership. Some fans now appear on-side with the rebrand through fear, not buy-in.
8- Limited brand leverage from other brands – Part of the plan seems to be to leverage the good things about Wales onto the Cardiff City brand. Cardiff City currently get bigger crowds than the Welsh national team.
9- Internal cost of brand ID change-over – Any brand that’s changed will know the amount of investment involved and in this case everything from stationary to stadium seats would need to be brought into line. It is an unnecessary expense on a costly exercise.
10- High existing investment in current brand ID - Take a walk around Cardiff city centre on any given day; yes, you see the inevitable Premier League shirts but over the past couple of years they’ve become to be outnumbered by Cardiff City merchandise. So much good work has been down here, it seems foolish to go back to square one.












